Skip to content
Evidence Base

Cyberbullying prevention within a socio-ecological framework: The ViSC social competence program

Keywords

Cyberbullying Cybervictimization Bullying prevention Whole school approach

Publication details

Year: 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811423-0.00014-6
Issued: 2018
Language: English
Start Page: 189
End Page: 202
Editors: Campbell M.; Bauman S.
Authors: Gradinger P.; Strohmeier D.
Type: Book chapter
Book title: Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools
Publisher: Elsevier
Place: Amsterdam
Topics: Learning; Internet usage, practices and engagement; Risks and harms; Researching children online: methodology and ethics
Sample: 2,042 students (47.6% girls), aged 11.7 years (SD ¼ 0.88) enrolled in 18 schools and 103 classes. Sustainability (e.g., the change between waves 3 and 2) was examined in a subsample of 6 schools and 35 classes comprising 659 students.
Implications For Parents About: Parental practices / parental mediation
Implications For Educators About: Digital citizenship; Other
Implications For Policy Makers About: Stepping up awareness and empowerment; Creating a safe environment for children online; Other
Other PolicyMaker Implication: Developing new school inclusive programs focused on preventing cyberbullying among young people with asperge syndrome or intellectual disabilities
Implications For Stakeholders About: Researchers

Abstract

Based on a socioecological perspective on development, this chapter discusses the value of implementing a general antibullying program to change cyberbullying and cybervictimization. To date, etiological models for cyberbullying and cybervictimization prevention are lacking, and longitudinal and experimental research on risk and protective factors regarding cyberbullying and cybervictimization is rather sparse. Therefore, it is important to know whether a general antibullying program is able to change cyberbullying and cybervictimization. This chapter describes the elements of the ViSC program, a socioecological primary prevention program originally developed in Austria, and reports evaluation results from studies conducted in Austria, Romania, Cyprus, and Turkey. In line with the socioecological framework, the program is more effective in reducing traditional bullying and victimization when delivered as a whole school program. Furthermore, the program is also effective in reducing cyberbullying and cybervictimization indicating that cyberforms of bullying share similar mechanisms with traditional forms of bullying.

Outcome

Using a Bivariate Multiple Group Latent Change Model for traditional aggression, traditional victimisation and age, results show programme effectiveness in relation to cyberbullying (latent d = 0.39) and cyber-victimisation (latent d = 0.29), indicating that these behaviours reflect a systemic (school) problem.

Related studies

All results