Skip to content
Evidence Base

Let's go outside! Environmental restoration amongst adolescents and the impact of friends and phones

Keywords

Adolescents Teenagers Nature Restoration Outdoors

Publication details

Year: 2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.007
Issued: 2016
Language: English
Volume: 48
Start Page: 131
End Page: 139
Editors:
Authors: Greenwood A.; Gatersleben B.
Type: Journal article
Journal: Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Topics: Internet usage, practices and engagement; Wellbeing
Sample: 120 16 to 18 year olds in the UK
Implications For Parents About: Parental practices / parental mediation

Abstract

Adolescents are experiencing an increasing number of psychological difficulties due to mental fatigue and stress. Natural environments have been found to be beneficial to psychological wellbeing by reducing stress and improving mood and concentration for most people. However, a number of studies have suggested that this may not be the case for adolescents perhaps because they have different social and emotional needs (to be with friends, not to be bored), although evidence is lacking. In a field experiment with 120 16e18 year olds in the UK we tested restoration of stress and mental fatigue in an outdoor or indoor environment, alone, with a friend or while playing a game on a mobile phone. The findings showed greater restoration amongst adolescents who had been in an outdoor setting containing natural elements, compared with those who had been in an indoor one. Moreover, being with a friend considerably increased positive affect in nature for this age group. The findings indicated that spending short school breaks in a natural environment with a friend can have a significant positive impact on the psychological wellbeing of teenagers.

Outcome

Playing a game on your phone when outside reduces the positive effects of being in an outdoor environment. "The only differences, however, found in the ‘with a phone’ context were negative ones, where playing a game on a mobile phone had a negative impact on concentration and on positive affect compared with being with a friend in both environments, and a marginal negative impact on a selfereport measure of attentiveness, although only when inside with a phone. This study did not produce any evidence to suggest that ‘doing something’ in nature might counter the negative appraisal sometimes made by teenagers of nature as ‘boring’. However, it may be that our choice of ‘activity’ was not an appropriate one for a number of reasons. Firstly, it represented an activity which teenagers may have found similar to the cognitive stressor tasks, and consequently reduced the likelihood of any effects. In addition, concentrating on a small mobile phone screen may have reduced the impact of both environments, with participants focusing on the screen and therefore not as cognizant of their surroundings. In particular, looking at the screen may have distracted the teenagers' attention away from the soft fascinating features of the natural environment. Unfortunately, we did not know what games the participants were playing; it is likely that the type of game as well as the extent to which the game demands attention will have influenced the findings." (Greenwood and Gatersleben, 2016: 138).

Related studies

All results