Skip to content
Evidence Base

Closing the gaps – Improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration

Publication details

Year: 2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004
Issued: 2016
Language: English
Volume: 99
Start Page: 68
End Page: 80
Editors:
Authors: Agélii Genlott A.; Grönlund Å.
Type: Journal article
Journal: Computers & Education
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Topics: Learning; Literacy and skills
Sample: 502 students in Sweden who had been exposed to different teaching methods over a period of three years during grades 1–3.
Implications For Educators About: STEM Education; School innovation; Other
Implications For Policy Makers About: Other
Other PolicyMaker Implication: Dissemination of methodological innovations important

Abstract

Literacy and mathematics are necessary skills that for different reasons unfortunately not everybody acquires sufficiently. In OECD countries there is also a gender gap; boys lag behind girls in literacy but often outperform girls in mathematics (OECD., 2012). ICT (Information and communication technologies) may contribute useful tools to address both these problems but in order to effectively create better educational conditions there is yet a need to develop effective methods that combine ICT with key factors for learning. This research contributes to this by measuring effects of the “Write to Learn” (WTL) method. WTL lets children from 1st grade use several ICT tools to write texts and subsequently discuss and refine them together with classmates and teachers using digital real-time formative feedback and assessment. The central learning factor addressed, in mathematics as well as in literacy, is the written communication allowing the learners to interact with peers and teachers. WTL draws on methods from socio-cultural theory, including continuous social interaction and written real-time formative feedback among peers, using shared electronic forums for collaboration, thereby providing social meaning and increased learning of literacy and mathematics, among both boys and girls. The study uses quantitative methods and two control groups, one using traditional method (no ICT) and one using technology individually (without integrated social interaction and formative feedback), to compare results from 502 students in grade 3 national tests in mathematics and literacy. WTL yields by far best results; higher average score both in literacy and mathematics, smaller gender gap, and significantly better results for the under-achievers. The ITU method performs worst, which shows that ICT use must be well integrated into the pedagogy to be useful.

Outcome

The tested Write-to-Learn (WTL) method for children from 1st grade incorporating several ICT tools to write texts and subsequently discuss and refine them together with classmates and teachers using digital real-time formative feedback and assessment lead to higher student achievement in literacy and mathematics and to a lower gender gap in performance, compared to 2 control groups. WTL also lead to better performance among low performers. "ICT use in itself does not lead to better results but may indeed lead to worse. It is only when ICT is used to support other pedagogic factors that have been shown to have positive impact more efficient and effective, and does so in a systematic way, that the positive results occur." (Authors, 78)

Related studies

All results