Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents
Keywords
Cyberbullying
Bystanders
Bystander effect
Publication details
Year: | 2015 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010 |
Issued: | 2015 |
Language: | English |
Volume: | 43 |
Start Page: | 96 |
End Page: | 99 |
Editors: | |
Authors: | Macháčková H.; Dědková L.; Mezulanikova K. |
Type: | Journal article |
Journal: | Journal of Adolescence |
Publisher: | Elsevier BV |
Topics: | Internet usage, practices and engagement; Literacy and skills; Risks and harms; Wellbeing; Social mediation |
Sample: | 679 adolescents aged 11-19 (M ¼ 15, SD ¼ 2.26; 71% girls) who agreed to participate in a survey conducted in seven schools in the Czech Republic in 2014 |
Abstract
This study examined the bystander effect in cyberbullying. Using self-reported data from 257 Czech respondents who had witnessed a cyberbullying attack, we tested whether provided help decreased with increased number of other bystanders. We controlled for several individual and contextual factors, including empathy, social self-efficacy, empathic response to victimization, and relationship to the victim. Results showed that participants tend to help the victims more in incidents with only one or two other bystanders. We also found that, as in the “offline” realm, bystander effect is not linear: no significant differences were found between incidents with a moderate number (3-10) and a larger number of total bystanders. Our findings, thus, provide support for the presence of the bystander effect in cyberbullying.
Outcome
"Results showed that participants tend to help the victims more in incidents with only one or two other bystanders. We also
found that, as in the “offline” realm, bystander effect is not linear: no significant difference were found between incidents with a moderate number (3-10) and a larger number of total bystanders." (Machackova, Dedkova, & Mezulanikova, 2015, Abstract)
"... the bystander effect is present in real cyberbullying incidents. .... When participants were practically the sole witnesses, they were more supportive than when there were more witnesses. However, this effect seems to be non-linear, as we found no difference between the participants reporting 3-10 and those reporting a higher number of bystanders." (Machackova, Dedkova, & Mezulanikova, 2015, p. 97)