Skip to content
Evidence Base

Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents

Keywords

Cyberbullying Bystanders Bystander effect

Publication details

Year: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010
Issued: 2015
Language: English
Volume: 43
Start Page: 96
End Page: 99
Editors:
Authors: Macháčková H.; Dědková L.; Mezulanikova K.
Type: Journal article
Journal: Journal of Adolescence
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Topics: Internet usage, practices and engagement; Literacy and skills; Risks and harms; Wellbeing; Social mediation
Sample: 679 adolescents aged 11-19 (M ¼ 15, SD ¼ 2.26; 71% girls) who agreed to participate in a survey conducted in seven schools in the Czech Republic in 2014

Abstract

This study examined the bystander effect in cyberbullying. Using self-reported data from 257 Czech respondents who had witnessed a cyberbullying attack, we tested whether provided help decreased with increased number of other bystanders. We controlled for several individual and contextual factors, including empathy, social self-efficacy, empathic response to victimization, and relationship to the victim. Results showed that participants tend to help the victims more in incidents with only one or two other bystanders. We also found that, as in the “offline” realm, bystander effect is not linear: no significant differences were found between incidents with a moderate number (3-10) and a larger number of total bystanders. Our findings, thus, provide support for the presence of the bystander effect in cyberbullying.

Outcome

"Results showed that participants tend to help the victims more in incidents with only one or two other bystanders. We also found that, as in the “offline” realm, bystander effect is not linear: no significant difference were found between incidents with a moderate number (3-10) and a larger number of total bystanders." (Machackova, Dedkova, & Mezulanikova, 2015, Abstract) "... the bystander effect is present in real cyberbullying incidents. .... When participants were practically the sole witnesses, they were more supportive than when there were more witnesses. However, this effect seems to be non-linear, as we found no difference between the participants reporting 3-10 and those reporting a higher number of bystanders." (Machackova, Dedkova, & Mezulanikova, 2015, p. 97)

Related studies

All results