Skip to content
Evidence Base

Cyber-aggression and psychological aggression in adolescent couples: A short-term longitudinal study on prevalence and common and differential predictors.

Keywords

Cyber-aggression Cyber dating abuse Psychological aggression

Publication details

Year: 2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106191
Issued: 2020
Language: English
Volume: 104
Start Page: 1
End Page: 9
Editors:
Authors: Muñoz-Fernández N.; Sánchez-Jiménez V.
Type: Journal article
Journal: Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Sample: The original sample comprised 1003 adolescents. Given the nature of the study, only those with romantic relationship experience (current or past relationship) were selected, which brought the final sample size down to 632 participants (321 boys; 51%) aged between 12 and 18 years.
Implications For Educators About: Digital citizenship; Other
Implications For Policy Makers About: Stepping up awareness and empowerment; Creating a safe environment for children online; Other
Other PolicyMaker Implication: The need of developing dating violence prevention programs focused on teenagers
Implications For Stakeholders About: Healthcare

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence of cyber-aggression in Spanish adolescent couples as well as the common and differential predictors for cyber-aggression and psychological aggression using a short-term longitudinal study. Over a 6-month period, six hundred and thirty-two (632) Spanish adolescents with romantic relationship experience from seven schools were randomly selected to participate in the study (51% male; average age ¼15.03). The results revealed a prevalence of cyber-aggression of 13% and that 68.3% of adolescents engaged in psychological aggression. Girls were significantly more involved than boys in both forms. The analysis of predictors for cyber and psychological aggression showed that these two forms of aggression shared a common factor, negative couple quality. Furthermore, cognitive empathy predicted cyber-aggression whereas anger regulation and jealousy predicted psychological aggression. These results highlighted the need to consider the particular characteristics of each setting, face-to-face and online, for designing future prevention programs.

Outcome

Results highlight that both, cyber and psychological aggression presented a conflictual nature. Anger and jealousy predicted psychological aggression, nonetheless, anger and jealousy were not associated to cyber aggression over time. On the other hand, cognitive empathy predicted cyber aggression but not psychology aggression and emotional and cognitive predictors affect both forms of violence differently. Muñoz-Fernández & Sánchez-Jiménez (2020: 7) highlight that "even though the prevalence of cyber-aggression was not as alarming as that of psychological aggression, it is a form of violence that should be addressed in future studies, specially from a prevention perspective". The authors point out that results of this study provided evidence that should be considered in the design of dating violence prevention curriculum-based programs that should emphasize "contents that address how to deal with conflicts when they appear in romantic relationships, the development of positive conflict resolution strategies, healthy communication skills, and emotion regulation strategies as well as tackling contents related to specific predictors of cyber-aggression, such as cognitive empathy. " (Muñoz-Fernández & Sánchez-Jiménez, 2020: 7-8). [Text adapted by the coder from the original manuscript]

Related studies

All results